Be warned. We are activists. We are biased.
We do our best to find and present facts, based on extensive primary research and using public sources.
But we will profit if these stocks decline or, when we are long, rise in value.
We do not offer advice on how anyone else should trade a stock. We present our views.
We do our best to find and present facts, based on extensive primary research and using public sources.
But we will profit if these stocks decline or, when we are long, rise in value.
We do not offer advice on how anyone else should trade a stock. We present our views.
MQ
The Marqeta house of cards may come tumbling down: an FBI investigation
could prompt MQ to lose up to 70% of its business. Future revenue looks
weak for this “dinosaur” of a payments-processing company.
- Marqeta (MQ) is (mostly) a payment processor. MQ helps fintechs host their own payments tools by contracting with a Banking as a Service (BaaS) partner bank to manage client deposits. As the intermediary, MQ earns a small percentage of swipe fees. Small banks looking for growth generally enter into these partnerships, and those banks often rely on the middleman processor for compliance.
- A collapsing MQ would be just one more in a series of BaaS-related businesses to go under. Since the 2023 troubles at Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and Silvergate, regulators have cracked down on BaaS providers, and companies like Synapse, Solid, and Evolve have folded under the weight of compliance failures and regulatory scrutiny. Big banks are disintermediating companies like MQ. The model is dying.
- We have discovered an FBI investigation into MQ’s partner, Sutton Bank, likely for alleged anti-money laundering (AML) failures. MQ’s biggest client is Cash App, which has been credibly alleged to enable lawbreaking. Those allegations have brought intense regulatory pressure to the tiny Ohio bank on which MQ depends for its processing of Cash App transactions. [1]
- If Sutton folds or pulls out of the partnership, we think MQ will shrink to a mere shadow of itself. Former executives with several years managing MQ’s relationship with Sutton say a switch would take years and is practically impossible.
- MQ was once a pioneer of the BaaS model. The tide turned in summer 2023, when MQ’s largest customer, Cash App owner Block (formerly Square, XYZ), took back more authority over accounts and left the risky part—clearing transactions—to MQ. Since then, MQ is taking on small clients with high churn. MQ expects another hit to revenue related to Cash App later this year. Far from a one-and-done, the damage from Block’s redefinition of their relationship is ongoing.
- We think MQ is especially vulnerable to the squeeze on the BaaS sector. Former executives call MQ a “dinosaur.” One commented, “It reminds me of AOL 25 years ago.”
- MQ’s regulatory headaches include potential bank liabilities for over 50 mln account holders.
- MQ’s attempts to reinvent itself outside the risky Cash App processing business have not worked to sideline Block or Cash App. Revenue is excessively concentrated. New client wins like the Found Mastercard and Rain Card are small and niche, while onboarding times have ballooned from 150 to 200 days. MQ’s contracted backlog provides some preview of revenue, and that backlog has declined since Q1 2024
- MQ is obscuring its weakness with window dressing and an empty acquisition. We calculated a decline in gross profit margin for quarters when MQ reported growth in that metric. Nor has MQ actually reduced its dependence on a single client. MQ is consistently getting lower payments per transaction. A 2023 “pre-revenue” acquisition that cost almost $300 mln has done nothing for MQ.
- MQ hoped that higher-margin credit cards from the 2023 acquisition would make its technology relevant again. But formers tell us that MQ has a negligible credit card business, probably sub 1%.
- Executives are being pushed out, as MQ acts panicky: Formers have told us that top executives are being fired for failing to sign new partners. MQ CEO Simon Khalaf “stepped down” in February 2025, the day the company issued its 10K, and has been replaced by an interim CEO. Before Khalaf, former CEO Jason Gardner stepped down as executive chairman in Q2 2024, apparently in a big hurry—he forfeited a whopping $167.3 mln in compensation.
- We think expectations will be disappointed in Q2 or FY2025: MQ has not taken into account the macro headwinds its partner Block sees. It claims lighter regulation, but evidence tells a different story. Cost cutting looks like it’s gone as far as it can.
FEATURED REPORTS
October 3, 2024
NNEThe Rampant Stock Promotion and Undisclosed Related Parties Behind the Empty Shell that is NNE
January 5, 2024
|
November 8, 2024
INODHidden Grand Jury DOJ Investigation Into Innodata Revealed
|
September 20, 2024
INOD
"Mag 7" agreements likely
|
May 20, 2024
BTMDBTMD May Make You Sick
![]() Photo presented by competitor Pro-pell as illustrating risks associated with hormone therapy.
|
June 27, 2023
LIBehind the Latest Lithium
|
October 7, 2021
FFIEMove Over, Lordstown:
|
Disclaimer
The reports and other commentary displayed are for information purposes only and should not be relied upon as investment advice. The information provided is not a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region, or market. Because market and economic conditions are subject to change, comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as of the date of this posting and may change without notice.
Opinions are intended to provide insight on macroeconomic issues and commentary is not intended as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy.
Investments involve risk. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. The information contained in these reports has not been reviewed in the light of your personal financial circumstances. Reliance upon the information is at your sole discretion.
The reports and other commentary displayed are for information purposes only and should not be relied upon as investment advice. The information provided is not a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region, or market. Because market and economic conditions are subject to change, comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as of the date of this posting and may change without notice.
Opinions are intended to provide insight on macroeconomic issues and commentary is not intended as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy.
Investments involve risk. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. The information contained in these reports has not been reviewed in the light of your personal financial circumstances. Reliance upon the information is at your sole discretion.